Answer:
b 146
Step-by-step explanation:
2 hours = 120 minutes
120 + 26 = 146
I DONT KNOW FHUEITHNGIFJTFRJNRGV
H
The answer is 2x(2x²+x+1).
When we subtract polynomials we combine like terms:
(9x³+2x²-5x+4)-(5x³-7x+4)
9x³-5x³=4x³
2x²- 0 = 2x²
-5x--7x=-5x+7x=2x
4-4=0
This gives us
4x³+2x²+2x
Each of these is divisible by 2, and each has an x, so we factor those out:
2x( )
4x³/2x = 2x²:
2x(2x² )
2x²/2x=x:
2x(2x²+x )
2x/2x = 1:
2x(2x²+x+1)
<span>0.03 x 1,000=30! In multiplying decimals, you'll move the decimal's period to the number of zeroes in the multiplier! 1,000 has 3 zeroes. So, it's equal to 30. So basically he was wrong because 0.03 times 1,000 doesn't equal 3 it equals 30. He made the mistake of not moving the decimal point enough.</span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The complete question is given thus:
Suppose that computer literacy among people ages 40 and older is being studied and that the accompanying tables describes the probability distribution for four randomly selected people, where x is the number that are computer literate. Is it unusual to find four computer literates among four randomly selected people?
x P(x)
0 0.16
1 0.25
2 0.36
3 0.15
4 0.08
ANSWER:
The odds that this will occur according to the chart are 0.08, or 8%, so although this is unlikely, it's not terribly unusual.
⇒ NO
So from the following we can say it is not unusual to find four (4) computer literates among four randomly selected people.
ok, so P(1) + P(2) + P(3) + P(4) + P(0) = 0.16+0.25+0.36+0.15+0.08 = 1
Whereas the chance of finding four (4) out of four (4) computer iteration is low when compared to other factors.
cheers i hope this helped !!
