Topic: Decision on traveling to Mars
Source 1: Alexander Fisher
Evidence 1: "Mars is the most likely planet for us to colonize"
Evidence 2: "The technology we would need to develop to send humans to Mars would directly benefit our economy here on Earth."
Evidence 3: "Studies have shown that radiation levels on Mars are not lethal to humans. Sure, we would have to live in a dome at first, but over time, we could use science to change the atmosphere and make it possible to go outside, just like on Earth!"
Source 2: Juniper Springs
Evidence 1: "...it is too dangerous. The atmosphere of the planet is more carbon dioxide than oxygen, and it’s very cold.
Evidence 2: "Also, going to Mars would be very expensive."
Evidence 3: "that does not mean they aren't dangerous." "It is foolish to think a dome would be able to protect us from all of the radiation."
<span>1. Ŧ
</span><span>2. Ŧ
</span><span>3. Ŧ
</span>4. Ŧ
<span>5. Ŧ
</span><span>6. Ŧ
</span><span>7. Ŧ
</span><span>8. Ŧ
</span><span>9. Ŧ</span>
Answer:
Read the monkeys paw
Explanation:
So you know how to write you’re paragraph and finish your assignment
Answer: I think it would be “her books off the table”
Explanation: that’s the only phrase that makes sense mark me brainliest if I’m correct
