You've found an Internet article that supports your view of a research subject. The author seems to have excellent credentials,
and the article is very well written. However, the author seems to be using outdated information to support her claims, and you can't find other articles that corroborate her information. Which of the following statements best describes what your course of action should be and why? A. You should use the article as a reference. The author is obviously an expert in her field and the information doesn't need to be "nitpicked." B. You should not use the article as a reference. The lack of corroboration and outdated information outweigh the author's credentials. C. You should use the article as a reference. The important thing is that you've found a source that will bolster your arguement. D. You should not use the article as a reference. Information from the Internet isn't trustworthy.
The answer is: [B]: <span>You should not use the article as a reference. The lack of corroboration and outdated information outweigh the author's credentials. ______________________________________________________________</span>
She wrote the book in part as a reaction to Edmunds Burke reflections on the French revolution.
Explanation:
It was a book written with the aim of sensitivity awareness towards the course of a women's right of being on these footing as men rebutting Burke view on strengthening of traditional structure of inheritance of position and property.
