All categories

3 years ago

For each of the situations, determine whether or not the government can limit or punish the speech

English

1 answer:

marysya [2.9K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Hi there! Your answers are:

1. No

2. No

3. No.

4. (There is no question for #4!!)

5. No

6. No

7. No

8. Yes.

9. Yes.

10. Yes

Explanation:

The only time that it is legal for a government to control somebody's speech is when they're actively calling for harm. Something like screaming fire in a movie theater can be prosecuted. Threatening violence, calling for violence, or creating terrorist organizations are all illegal and are regulated by the US Government

I hope this makes sense! Let me know if you need further clarification!

You might be interested in

This is for real please help

Scilla [17]

It is 16 because of PEMDAS

4 0

3 years ago

Do you believe voters should be required to show identification to vote? Why or Why not?

Free_Kalibri [48]

Yes, because it is a right to vote and some votes aren’t serious

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In spite of all the learned have said, I still my old opinion keep; The posture that we give the dead, Points out the soul's ete

yulyashka [42]

Why does the speaker disagree with native burial customs?

(A)The speaker believes that death is an eternal sleep.

(B)The speaker believes people should not be buried with every day objects.

(C)The speaker believes Native Americans will rest well in the afterlife.

(D)The speaker believes that death should not be joyful.

The answer is A because int he native customs it is believe that after death our souls are seated with his friends, eating, etc. For the speaker this means that the soul is not resting as we should do after death. The speaker believes that whe you die you are in an eternal sleep.

If my answer helped you please give me 5 stars and Brainliest answer. Thank you.

8 0

4 years ago

In "I Hear America Singing." This poem celebrates average American workers. What inference can you make about how Whitman might

Alecsey [184]

Answer:

What inference can you make about how Whitman might have felt about wealthy people who do not have to work for a living?

I believe Whitman does not regard wealthy people as having the same importance or uniqueness as the average American workers.

Explanation

This poem is about celebrating America and the working class that is its backbone. Whitman makes sure to mention several professions, men and women:

Those of mechanics, each one singing his as it should be blithe and strong,

The carpenter singing his as he measures his plank or beam,

The mason singing his as he makes ready for work, or leaves off work,

The boatman singing what belongs to him in his boat, the deckhand singing on the steamboat deck,

The shoemaker singing as he sits on his bench, the hatter singing as he stands,

The wood-cutter’s song, the ploughboy’s on his way in the morning, or at noon intermission or at sundown,

The delicious singing of the mother, or of the young wife at work, or of the girl sewing or washing,

He does not, however, at any moment, mention the wealthy. Those who do not have to work for a living are not celebrated in this poem at all. The people mentioned in the poem have something unique, special about them precisely because of their occupations and hard work. They probably view life in a unique manner. Those who do not work cannot possess this kind of perspective or knowledge. There is not anything worthy of mention, at least for Whitman, about the wealthy.

4 0

3 years ago

What is un abrazo? go to greetings. a kiss a fruit a full embrace, while patting each other on the back a type of house

katrin [286]

Answer:

a full embrace, while patting each other on the back

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers