1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
leva [86]
3 years ago
14

Which of the following has been the most significant impact of Supreme Court decision like Engel v. Vitale?

History
1 answer:
bekas [8.4K]3 years ago
6 0
The correct answer for this question is this one: "These decisions have made a clear separation between church and state."

<span>The statement that has been the most significant impact of Supreme Court decision like Engel v. Vitale is that </span><em>These decisions have made a clear separation between church and state.</em>
Hope this helps answer your question and have a nice day ahead.
You might be interested in
In many industrialized areas of the world, privatization has been the norm for about 30 years. In which of the following areas i
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

Latin America

Explanation:

In Latin America, citizens are opposed to government privatization policies. The more educated Latin Americans are, the lesser their support for privatization of state-owned means of production. As a result of this, privatization is highly unpopular in Latin America.

Privatization has sparked large-scale protests in Latin America. A large majority of Latin Americans are of the opinion that privatization has not helped economic development of the region. The percentage of the Latin American population who hold this view has been increasing steadily in recent years.

While privatization has been the norm in many industrialized nations, the same can not be said concerning Latin America.

6 0
4 years ago
Railroad cattle towns were known for —
irinina [24]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was life in towns different from life on the manor?
Yanka [14]
Well, people who lived on a manor were very much self-sufficient. They grew most of their own food, and peasant women spun and wove wool and flax into cloth to make the family's clothing, made their own butter and cheese, brewed their own ale,and would make household items like candles and soap. 

In towns, people would be more likely to buy a lot of things ready-made from shops and markets. There would be more specialised tradesmen and craftsmen than there would be in a village. 

In both town and country, families tended to be involved in the family enterrpise, whatever it might be. In the country, all family members would labour on the family farm, in the town the whole family might be involved in the family business or trade, whatever it might be. 

In a manor, the inhabitants would be subjec to a large extent to the will of the Lord of the manor, and would owe him labour services on his won farm (demesne), and if they were serfs they were not free to leave unless the lord gave them permission. In the towns, most people were free and lived their lives independent of the will of a lord (hence the saying 'town air makes you free'). 

In both town and country, the church was an important part of people's lives. A church was not just for church services, often the building was used for secular purposes as well, in the village it would be used for meetings of the manor court, in towns it might be used for meetings of the town council, guild meetings etc. 

In the country, women were normally expected to be the family doctors, and would be expected to make home rmeedies for ailments, be able to stitch up wounds, set broken bones etc. In a town, people would be more likely to have access to a doctor or apothecary, or to a barber-surgeon. 

Another major difference of course would be that far more people in those days lived in the country than in towns, the manorial way of life would be more familiar to a far greater number of people than town life.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a true statement about the state and federal amendment processes? The process at the state level has m
Andreas93 [3]

AnswerI just took the test, I dont get the answer but I know B  is the wrong answer. It is A or C but I think it is A

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did manufacturers hire children to work in their factories?
vekshin1

Answer:

A - Factory owners could pay children less money than they paid adults.  

Explanation:

Whenever a business/production line proprietor can lessen his/her expense with respect to paying laborers, they will take. This is the situation with children laborers. Not paying these youngsters indistinguishable wages from grown-ups enable the processing plant proprietors to keep more money for themselves or they can utilize that capital for other expenses.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe how pre-columbian Native Americans lived in one region
    15·1 answer
  • What was Clara Ackermans view on politics and the great depression in her diary?
    13·1 answer
  • Which immigration act removed quotes and began to establish migration chains, favoring children, spouses, and parents of U.S. ci
    15·1 answer
  • The legislature is often referred to as "the first branch of government <br>True <br>False​
    15·1 answer
  • Why did some gray plains tribes migrate
    5·2 answers
  • Why were the citizens of France angry?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the us concerned for the soviet union
    15·1 answer
  • What region is named northern island A B C D
    6·1 answer
  • After winning independence from Spain, Bolivia:
    13·1 answer
  • The passage is from the United Nations charter. Based on the passage, which were the primary goals of the newly formed United Na
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!