Answer:
It could get ugly
Explanation:
Conflict confrontation would only yield good results if both parties involved are ready to resolve their differences. Otherwise, it could result to greater issues as it could become ugly and lead to yelling, abuses, and probably violent actions.
When confrontation leads to this, it destroys the positive relationship that was in existence between both parties involved.
Answer:
B) show a sudden jump on one particular trial and remain high thereafter.
Explanation:
When a person learns any task by insights or by intuition, that particular task remains in the memory of the person for ever. The process and task inculcates and stays in the person's memory.
When the person performs a task, he shows a sudden jump in one of the practice trials and after that he masters that skill and maintains the performance level.
His performance of performing the task gradually increases after he practices and performs the task again and again. He finally masters the task and never forgets the task in his life thus increasing the performance.
Thus the answer is B) show a sudden jump on one particular trial and remain high thereafter.
Answer: Similarity
Explanation:
Similarity principle of forming relationships states that relationships are formed due to the similarity in nature of individuals that tends to attract them towards each other form a relation. Same behavior, thinking, likes, dislikes ,opinions etc are the characteristics that are factors behind people forming relationship.
As the situation is question states that Talal and Hongwu belong to completely different culture but still persist similarity in opinions and experiences which makes them attract towards each other to become friends.
Thus, the situation is based on similarity principle for establishing relationship.
.
None of it was Independent :)
Answer:
it would likely overturn the punitive damage award as grossly excessive
Explanation:
Melissa's tugboat accidentally collides with Tyler's yacht, and Tyler sues Melissa for negligence. A federal jury finds Melissa liable and awards Tyler $5,000 in compensatory damages as well as $50 million in punitive damages. Melissa appeals to the United States Supreme Court, challenging the punitive damages award. If the Supreme Court heard the case, it would likely overturn the punitive damage award as grossly excessive because punitive damage are awarded if the compensatory damage are deem inadequate remedy and are awarded both to deter the defendant and others from conduct similar to the conduct that gave rise to the lawsuit.