Answer: C. Reformation
Explanation: A non-compete agreement or clause is a legal binding entered into by two or more parties which restricts the parties from being in competition with the other usually through the sale of similar product. However, in the context above, since the non-compete clause has been breached by Jack, and the judge feels the time constraint in the clause was unreasonably long, The reformation process will be best to remediate the situation, which refers to the change or alteration of the terms of an existing document using the judicial process and requires the conformation of the parties involved.
Employee salaries
The employee salaries is something that comes under the Operating Activities of a business, in its Cash Flow Statement. Therefore an Operating Cash Flow would be Employee Salaries in this case.
Answer:
$47
Explanation:
Given that,
Required return = 11.00%
Expect a growth rate = 6.00%
Expected to pay a dividend next year = $2.35
Stock Price:
= Dividends (Div) ÷ (Expected Return (R) - Dividend Growth Rate (G))
= $2.35 ÷ (11% - 6%)
= $2.35 ÷ (5%)
= $47
Therefore, the current fair price for the stock is $47.
Answer:
Alpha for A is 1.40%; Alpha for B is -0.2%.
Explanation:
First, we use the CAPM to calculate the required returns of the two portfolios A and B given the risks of the two portfolios( beta), the risk-free return rate ( T-bill rate) and the Market return rate (S&P 500) are given.
Required Return for A: Risk-free return rate + Beta for A x ( Market return rate - Risk-free return rate) = 5% + 0.7 x (13% - 5%) = 10.6%;
Required Return for A: Risk-free return rate + Beta for B x ( Market return rate - Risk-free return rate) = 5% + 1.4 x (13% - 5%) = 16.2%;
Second, we compute the alphas for the two portfolios:
Portfolio A: Expected return of A - Required return of A = 12% - 10.6% = 1.4%;
Portfolio B: Expected return of B - Required return of B = 16% - 16.2% = -0.2%.
The answer is True. Hope this helps