Answer:c
Explanation:I think it is c cause he was trying to encourage them do something about everyt that has happened may need to check again.
Answer:
Answer is in explanation
Explanation:
In a command economy, the government determines what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is distributed. Private enterprise does not exist in a command economy. The government employs all workers and unilaterally determines their wages and job duties. Some advantages can be less inequality because the government controls the means of production in a command economy, it determines who works where and for how much pay. This power structure contrasts sharply with a free market economy, in which private companies control the means of production and hire workers based on business needs, paying them wages set by invisible market forces. Low Unemployment Levels, Unlike the invisible hand of the free market, which cannot be manipulated by a single company or individual, a command economy government can set wages and job openings to create the unemployment rate and wage distribution that it sees fit. Disadvantages can be Lack of Competition Inhibits Innovation, Critics argue that the inherent lack of competition in command economies hinders innovation and keeps prices from resting at an optimal level for consumers. Although those who favor government control criticize private firms that esteem profit above all else, it is undeniable that profit is a motivator and drives innovation. At least partly for this reason, many advancements in medicine and technology have come from countries with free market economies, such as the United States and Japan. Inefficiency, Efficiency is also compromised when the government acts as a monolith, controlling every aspect of a country's economy. The nature of competition forces private companies in a free market economy to minimize red tape and keep operating and administrative costs to a minimum. If they get too bogged down with these expenses, they earn lower profits or need to raise prices to meet expenses. Ultimately, they are driven out of the market by competitors capable of operating more efficiently.
<span>This question can refer to either first or second World Wars. In both cases it happened that 1) the immigrans and refugees went to other countries - such as Latin America, which affected those countries 2) almost all countries were affiliated with one or the other side - sending them ams for example 3) many other countries send their men to fight in those wars, which is why many Canadians and US-Americans fought and died in Europe</span>
I think it would be the eighteenth century
<span>Coffee is normally produced in the developed countries of
the world. The funny thing is that the developing countries are known for the
maximum consumption of coffee. This has not only had a great social impact on
the society but the coffee plantation has a great financial effect as well.
This product is sold at a very profitable rate and so it has got a big
financial angle for a country as well. The Coffee producing countries earn good
amount of foreign currency by selling it and thereby improve their own economy.
</span>
