When looking at what the subject does in a sentence, you are looking at the action. A sentence consists of two basic parts: who/what is doing what. The cat (who/what) chased the mouse (did what). The subject is the who/what part of the sentence, and the verb is the action of the sentence. Consider the following sentence: He ran quickly. A pronoun is a word that renames the noun ("he" rather than "Jim" or some other proper name). And an adverb modifies a verb ("quickly" modifies "ran").
Answer:
Tadael Brook
Ethiopia
St.Joseph School
4 years
Play and watch Football ⚽
bored
+2519456785
Answer:
4. PART B: Which quote from the text best supports the answer to Part A?
D "Just as computers might use stories or narratives as a way to structure memory and learning, humans may as well." ( Paragraph 8).
Yes, stories are key to human intelligience. Most story tellers are highly intelligent people who pass across vital information under the guide of story telling as could be seen in the various wisdome told in the bible about stories of great people.
Explanation:
I would go for the first one. If the euro decreases in value, that would mean it's cheaper to buy more of. The economy as a whole in Europe would decline with the currency they use. Things would be cheaper.
The correct answer is: C) You should eat corn at every meal.
An explicit message is characterized by the direct way it tells things. It leaves no room for vagueness, implication or ambiguity, going straight to the main point. When receiving an explicit message no questions are left, there are not hidden meaning or intents.
The sentece "You should eat corn at every meal.", has those characteristics, it tells you what to do, nothing more, nothing less.
The other sentences try to deliver the same message but in a vague way, they relate eating corn with possitive things like patriotism. This is more related to subliminal messages in which things are not easily perceived, the real meaning is hidden. As a result a person can do something based on the message, believing that his actions have one particular cause (e.g. eating corn to be patriotic) but actually they respond to unknown causes (e.g. the corn industry).
