Answer:
B. decision styles are consistent among top managers
Explanation:
Decision making styles differ between managers. Many managers exercise autocratic style which is authoritative wherein very limited inputs from the subordinates are taken and there is little scope for constructive advises.
In heuristic style, the strategies help managers to take clear cut decisions in a prompt manner. In such a form, decisions are arrived at quickly.
Managerial decision making methods differ from manager to manager and are an outcome of managers own judgement and demeanor.
Hence it is evident from above points that decision styles are not consistent among top managers.
Answer:
Debit bad debt with $4,000, and credit Accounts receivable also with $4,000.
Explanation:
New bad written off = Accounts receivable × 4% = $100,000 × 4% = $4,000
The journal entries will be as follows:
<u>Details Dr ($) Cr ($) </u>
Bad debt 4,000
Accounts receivable 4,000
<u><em>Being a bad written off the accounts receivable </em></u>
Answer:
Spread the risk of individual bonds by collectively owning more and less-risky bonds, with higher and lower rates of return
Explanation:
A bond fund is a pooled investment vehicle that invests in various types of bonds. the types of bonds invested in includes cooperate bonds, government bonds and municipal bonds.
The primary objective of bond funds is to generate revenue for investors
Because bond fund is an aggregation of various types of bonds, the risk of the bond fund is lower than the risk of holding any corporate bonds. This is because risks are spread.
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
The amortization operation consists of regularly distributing the repayment of the principal (C0), together with the interest accrued throughout the life of the loan. The periodic payments made by the borrower are therefore intended to reimburse, extinguish or amortize the initial capital. This justifies the name of the depreciation transaction and the depreciation terms that are usually assigned to these payments.
The biggest losers in that case were the tax payers.
Under the <span> institutional treasury management case, it involved the frauding of millions of dollars that is hidden from a certain investment account.
If not being fraud ,These millions of dollar should've resulted in about 40% tax rate that will be used by the government for the benefit of the taxpayers in the form of welfare or other infrastructures</span>