Answer:
Since Carly Schmidlap enjoys watching movies at the theater, her perceptual constancy is already familiar with the the shapes, size and the brightness of the theater which will make her enjoy her movie since she is already familiar with it. By providing context clues in the movie will help Carly Schmidlap enjoy the movie more cause context clues provide extra information or explain things more which will make the movie more enjoyable. Also by using the phi phenomenon in movies gives the impression that static object are moving which creates excitement in the viewer. Watching a movie in the theater on a large screen will give a priming effect causing Carly Schmidlap to experience or recognize other things later.
Explanation: Perceptual constancy or object constancy also known as constancy phenomenon comprises of shape, size and brightness of things or objects and creates the notion or tendency that humans and animals see things or perceive things such as shape, size, color or location as having a particular or familiar standard even when there is a change in the object or location.
Context clues give or provide more information about a word or phrase that helps readers to understand the meaning and word better. It provides more information that best describes or explains text whether directly or indirectly.
Phi phenomenon is an imagination or illusion that when objects that do not move are kept side by side tend to move. This effect is used in theater marquees when light is placed side by side to give the impression that the light is moving.
Priming is a psychological term used to describe an effect which exposes stimulus experience to lead to another stimulus at a later stage. That is a stimulus effect or exposure will lead to a response to a later stimulus. Priming helps to train one's memory which leads to individuals recognizing words or phrases at a later stage or in future.
Answer:
The supreme court is the highest judicial court in a country or state. A Plaintiff In The Supreme Court Nondiscrimination Case Did Not Get To See Victory. But not everyone involved in the case was there to see the victory. Aimee Stephens was the sole transgender plaintiff, and Stephens passed away last month. From member station in Detroit, Eli Newman has this remembrance. The goal was that she wanted to live. She got to live. The key rights were seeing Victory. No, it did not really center on an issue of civil rights or civil liberties. The majority of the court was for her to live. Some disagreed because they didn't want her to live. It had an impact on American society because they are finally allowed to see Victory.
Hope that answered your question. Please mark as Brainly. Thank You! Have a great day!
According to science, yes – happiness, indeed, has a heritable component. It’s a finding that is surprising and not surprising at the same time. It's surprising because of our culturally-sanctioned convictions that with our choices, thoughts, and behavior, we have the final say on how well we function in our lives, not our circumstances. But it's also not surprising because if our genes play a part in shaping who we are in the world, they will also have a say in how we pursue and find happiness. People might inherit genes that put them in advantageous or less favorable positions. Depression is genetic...
