The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
Native Americans primarily passed information to the next generation through the use of storytelling. Native Americans would tell stories to their children, who would later pass it down to their children. This passed the culture down from one generation to the next.
Answer:
The British government tightened control by not allowing the settlers to move west So they were kept in a smaller place. Also the British government made the quartering act that made the colonists house redcoats in their homes.
The region was home to numerous local conflicts over many years.
"(3) The federal government must protect the <span>nation’s lands from exploitation" sums up how Roosevelt felt about natural resources. He was the first to mak national parks. </span>