1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yan [13]
3 years ago
12

Why did the people of boston dislike the british soldiers?

History
1 answer:
blsea [12.9K]3 years ago
7 0
Because they were living in their homes and eating all of their food because the people of boston were forced by the government ot else they would be arrested
You might be interested in
One of the major flaws under the Articles of Confederation was:
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

One of the biggest problems was that the national government had no power to impose taxes. To avoid any perception of “taxation without representation,” the Articles of Confederation allowed only state governments to levy taxes. To pay for its expenses, the national government had to request money from the states.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help due today asap
Effectus [21]

Due to its energy consumption, desalinating sea water is generally more costly than fresh water from surface water or groundwater, water recycling and water conservation. However, these alternatives are not always available and depletion of reserves is a critical problem worldwide.[5][6] Desalination processes are usually driven by either thermal (in the case of distillation) or electrical (in the case of reverse osmosis) as the primary energy types.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Tenant farming encouraged the rise of a new class of wealthy
vagabundo [1.1K]
Tenant farming encouraged the rise of a new class of wealthy black farmers.

6 0
2 years ago
Why did farmers in the late 1800s want inflation? A. Inflation would make it easier to get loans from banks. B. Inflation would
Vera_Pavlovna [14]
<span>Farmers in the late 1800s wanted inflation because D. they hoped the rise in prices would increase their income. Inflation refers to the rise in the price of the goods, which consequently makes these farmers who produce the goods get more money because the goods now cost more. So it is only natural they would want inflation so as to get more money for their products that they sell to the markets and grocery stores and such.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
how can we interpret and compare speeches from president lincoln and Obama, and from Frederick Douglass, to help us analyze the
zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

I have a short article included to help.

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass’s 1845 Narrative continues to be a popular pedagogical text for high school and college curricula for the didactic reason that Douglass is a strong advocate for the benefits of reading and writing. Responding to the rumor that he might have been a well-educated freeman masquerading as a runaway slave, the educational elements of Douglass’s autobiography were partially intended to explain the source of his eloquence—tracing his beginning lessons in penmanship with neighborhood boys in Baltimore to his clandestine reading of The Columbian Orator. By including the letter he forged in his first escape attempt, he implies the message that literacy set him free. Setting a precedent for many African American literary figures who came after him, including Ralph Ellison’s fictionalized Invisible Man and the real-life President Barack Obama, Douglass fashioned a compelling explanation of his coming-to-voice, which even competes with, and eventually eclipses, the drama of his escape in the book’s final chapters.

One of the most dramatic emblems of Douglass’s literary education is the moment he becomes moved to address the ships on the Chesapeake Bay—it is a picture in words of his oratorical birth. In William Lloyd Garrison’s preface to Frederick Douglass’s 1845 Narrative, he celebrates the theatrical scene: Reduced to total abjection by the brutality of his slavemaster Covey, Douglass retreats to the Chesapeake shore on Sunday, and gives a moving speech to the white-sailed ships on the horizon. Performing as if he were on stage, Douglass laments his misery, questions whether there is a God, and concludes that since Covey is probably going to kill him anyway, he might as well try to escape. According to Garrison, Douglass’s oratorical tableau is the visual and literary epitome of the basic human desire for freedom—a “whole Alexandrine library of thought, feeling, and sentiment” (7). Like Garrison’s investment in The Liberator’s 1850 masthead, adapting Josiah Wedgwood’s image of a shackled and kneeling slave asking, “Am I not a man and a brother?,” Garrison points Douglass’s readers to this moving portrait of suffering with the hope that they, too, will vicariously experience the slave’s resolution for freedom.1 Although Garrison seems to have hoped that the scene would principally inspire sympathy for Douglass among his white readers, in Douglass’s hands it also turns into a representation of literary agency with lasting significance for African American literature. Douglass’s figure of himself—embodied in words—as communicating with the nation is echoed in similar moments of coming-to-voice in African American literary figures to the present day, and has become one of the most enduring elements of his rhetorical legacy.

Douglass’s waterside speech is a curiously artistic milestone in antislavery testimony even beyond its anguished desperation. Garrison might have pointed to many other dramatic passages—such as the whipping of Aunt Hester, the slave auction, the abandonment of Douglass’s grandmother, or even the fight with Covey—but he chose instead to highlight this highly literary, if not overwrought, transformational moment in Douglass’s consciousness. In his essay on the aesthetic elements of Douglass’s Narrative, written over forty years ago, Albert Stone argued this speech was an expression of Douglass’s artistic impulses to imaginatively synthesize his thought processes concerning freedom (72).2 But put more bluntly, he might have admitted that Douglass probably never gave this speech at all. Part of what makes Douglass’s first autobiography so effective is his ability to blend his largely factual account of slavery so seamlessly with the inventions of art. Like his deliberately falsified account of his grandmother’s abandonment and death, whose purple passages remained in his autobiographies even after he admitted that they were not true, Douglass’s speech is one of the more glaring examples of his departure from conventional fact in telling his story

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1948, the United Nations created the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to A) restrict people’s basic rights.
    9·2 answers
  • 1. How did Elijah Lovejoy and William Lloyd Garrison contribute to the abolitionist movement?
    13·2 answers
  • Please help me with number 3. (It includes the picture on the right!)
    8·1 answer
  • Choose all that apply. Zoroastrianism practices the threefold path of _____. good thoughts good deeds good food good behavior go
    5·2 answers
  • Why were westerners so determined to colonize southeast asia
    11·1 answer
  • Can you please help me I will give out the brain thing and extra points
    10·2 answers
  • Do you believe that parents should have all of the powers described in the Parents’ Constitution? Why or why not?
    9·2 answers
  • Who of the following was Abraham's heir prior to the Abrahamic covenant?
    12·1 answer
  • Tiffany lives in a northern US state. She wears a parka outdoors to keep herself warm. She also needs to put on heavy boots and
    13·2 answers
  • What were the 2 main reasons for the spread of Islam
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!