Hello. Unfortunately, you did not present the speeches to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for me to answer you. However, I will try to help you as much as possible.
The only way to answer this question is to read both articles completely and understand the arguments and opinions presented by the authors. After doing these readings, you should identify the text that was most significant to you. It is likely that this is the text that you agree with the author's arguments, or that managed to provoke a strong reflection in you. Once you've identified this, you should look for which part of this text that made an impact on you and managed to make you choose it. This part is the text element that was meaningful to you.
Answer: look the word up in a key reference work of that discipline.
Explanation: When referring to disciplinary insight, We might regard this to mean a well thought inference or conclusion made about a certain research work or problem after thorough consideration and analysis by professionals or experts in that field. Drawing disciplinary insight requires careful and effective study due to the ambiguities or overlap which may seem to occur in the evidences, words or supporting statements the supporting statements which makes the need to verify and confirm the actual meaning of texts or words in previous researches in that same discipline. This ensures a clearer and broadened knowledge which is required for drawing disciplinary insights.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Anti- does suggest that it's has a negative feel to it, but the root word in the word is " climax ". This words is saying that the star of the show had an uninteresting ending.
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
Answer: Humans were hunters and gatherers, they were always trying to find new food and plants. This is why they moved from one place to another
I hope this helped!
<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>
- Zack Slocum
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
