Answer would be conflict. Antagonist is essentially the protagonist's enemy.
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because "Tevye's analogy is supporting the idea of marrying only Jews; however, it does not explain
the reason why this is supposed to happen".
<h3>How Tevye's analogy is different</h3>
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because it doesn't give reasons to why one is supposed to "seek his own kind".
It is good to seek one's own kind so as to avoid the cultural problem in marriage. It helps to solve the problem of origin differences.
Culture is very important in any relationship. In order not to have different perspectives on an issue, it is ideal to go into relationships with people of the same culture.
Learn more about analogy:
brainly.com/question/13978016
Answer:
Please mark brainliest :)))
Explanation:
So we can start off with:
The call to action: Attend a board meeting to voice your action
Supporting reason: The town has a large population of children
Claim: A playground should be built in the park
Evidence: there is currently nowhere for the kids to play
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "It informs the reader because it describes the importance of the Bible in Momma’s life." The best analysis of this passage is that <span>It informs the reader because it describes the importance of the Bible in Momma’s life.</span>
