The word "nature" is used differently in two sentences as: In the first passage, it tells that the person by nature is free and positive in the second, nature is used to the person's inherent tendency and also negatively.
<h3>What is the passage about?</h3>
The first sentence is one that talks about nature as a kind of necessity that is needed by human. It implies that humans are known to be naturally free and it is an aspect of life. In the second sentence, nature is seed as a trait that pertains to human and that some few person do have a specific trait.
The ‘nature’ is known to be used positively and in the second, it is said to be used negatively. The passage tells about the combine sentiment of the inhabitant of America that all men are free by nature.
Hence, The word "nature" is used differently in two sentences as: In the first passage, it tells that the person by nature is free and positive in the second, nature is used to the person's inherent tendency and also negatively.
Learn more about nature from
brainly.com/question/372421
#SPJ1
See full question below
How is the word "nature" used differently in these two sentences? Use the complete passage to support your answer. "If we may collect the sentiments of the people of America, from their own most solemn declarations, they hold this truth as self-evident, that all men are by nature free." "Some are of such a nature that they cannot be surrendered."
Answer:
Did Mirian and her family have dinner at six o'clock?
Explanation:
Para pasar la afirmación a una pregunta, es fundamental que la oración comience con la palabra Did, que implica una pregunta formulada respecto de una cuestión que sucedió en el pasado. Luego, el verbo had debe articularse en tiempo presente, es decir, como have, en tanto el tiempo pasado es determinado por el artículo did.
Answer:
"Fourty" is improperly spelled. The way you spell it is "Forty"
