Answer:
his/her purpose is the correct answer. Hope this helped :)
Explanation:
Answer:
the two sentences are: “The apathy which seemed to take...” and “When they were about a mile...”
Explanation:
plato/ edmentum users
Answer:
No, none that I am aware of. In Shakespeare’s time, a tragedy meant that the main character falls from fortune to disaster, normally because of a flaw or fate. Obviously, other characters may be unharmed, or may even benefit from the protagonist’s downfall. I’m not writing to make fun of other posters, but we could as easily call the Matrix a tragedy because Agent Smith loses, or say that Titanic has a happy ending for coffin salesmen. Yes, Macduff or Fortinbras do well at the end of their plays, but they are not the protagonists.
For that reason, because a pre-modern tragedy definitionally means that the hero falls, and that’s what happens in Shakespeare’s plays, I’d say no. There are “problem” plays such as the Merchant of Venice, where the opposite happens—a comedy has a partly sad ending, with Shylock’s defeat—but again, it’s all in what the protagonist does, and Antonio (the merchant) wins at its close when his ships return
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
i can't give you evidence but I can explain like:
first of all the protagonist or antagonists of the article will be not only be famous or infamous in social media but in reality also they would be praised or criticized. it can affect life of people
but all groups or a large chunk of people
