Answer:
Valid evidence is based on facts or sound reasoning; invalid evidence is based on incorrect facts or faulty reasoning.
&
Valid evidence is based on information that is closely related to the point being made; invalid evidence is based on contradictory or unconnected information.
Emerson obviously reveres nature and believes that one should maintain a sense of awe and wonder that children have in appreciating natural beauty. Also he states that nature does not display a mean appearance for example in such things as glorious sunsets ore even in menacing natural phenomena like erupting volcanoes at night time the pyroclastics cascading down the slopes of the volcano are beautiful. He speaks of the "integrity of impression made by manifold natural objects" and this is reminiscent of Alexander Von Humboldt when he and his partner Bonpland the botanist first arrived in what became known as Venezuela they were both drunk by the myriad wonderful aspects of the lush vegetation in all its tropical splendor. Emerson said "a wild delight runs through the man in spite of sorrows" at the sight of nature and that is what Humboldt and Bonpland experienced especially since they were natural scientists so could appreciate the natural environment much more.
Answer:
I think it's B, correct me if I'm wrong.
The answer is C.
We’re talking about what changes can be made to keep players safe from head injuries
Answer A is incorrect because the time head injuries were first discovered is irrelevant to keeping kids safe.
Answer B is incorrect because you’re asking a yes or no question for a difficult and elaborate topic.
Answer D is incorrect because we’re currently examining why head injuries are dangerous and what can be done to prevent them.
Answer E is incorrect because this is just speaking of the faults of the human skull. This doesn’t help truly solve the changes that can be made.
I hope this helps!
