Answer:
They did not wanted the central government to abuse their authority.
Explanation:
The initial draft of the constitution was created to ensure that the citizens of United States have the highest power within the government. The founding fathers analyze the weaknesses of monarchy system (which was the dominant system back then) and purposefully designed the constitution to fix those weaknesses by reducing the power of the central government.
But, a group called the Federalist appear and advocated for the change of the initial draft of the constitution. They believed that the initial draft make the central government became very inefficient. The anti-federalists opposed this and believed that the initial draft of the constitution was created to balance the power of the states and central government. They fear that if they made any change/ratification to this initial draft, that balance will be disrupted.
The alternatives here are the command economy and a (pure) market economy.
The US economy is not a comman market economy because most of it is not centrally planned, as was the case in the Soviet Union.
However, The US economy is not a pure market economy because some of it is centrally regulated, for example certain substances are forbidden.
The conversion of farmable or habitable land to desert, as by a change in climate or destructive land use, is known as desertification.
If they can't interpret the constitution it makes it harder to make laws that still respect everyone's rights along with being able to give everyone there equal rights during a trial.
