Brain drain can be described as the process in which a country loses its most educated and talented workers to other countries through migration. This trend is considered a problem, because the most highly skilled and competent individuals leave the country, and contribute their expertise to the economy of other countries. The country they leave can suffer economic hardships because those who remain don't have the 'know-how' to make a difference.
Brain drain can also be defined as the loss of the academic and technological labor force through the moving of human capital to more favorable geographic, economic, or professional environments. More often than not, the movement occurs from developing countries to developed countries or areas.
Causes of Brain Drain
There are various causes of brain drain, but they differ depending on the country that's experiencing it. The main causes include seeking employment or higher paying jobs, political instability, and to seek a better quality of life. Causes of brain drain can be categorized into push factors and pull factors.
The push factors are negative characteristics of the home country that form the impetus for intelligent people migrating from Lesser Developed Countries(LDC). In addition to unemployment and political instability, some other push factors are the absence of research facilities, employment discrimination, economic underdevelopment, lack of freedom, and poor working conditions.
Pull factors are the positive characteristics of the developed country from which the migrant would like to benefit. Higher paying jobs and a better quality of life are examples of pull factors. Other pull factors include superior economic outlook, the prestige of foreign training, relatively stable political environment, a modernized educational system to allow for superior training, intellectual freedom, and rich cultures. These lists are not complete; there may be other factors, some of which can be specific to countries or even to individuals.
<u>Bottom-up estimating technique</u> decomposes the work into lower, more detailed pieces.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Bottom-up estimating is the process of the estimation of work at the lowest possible level of detail. The estimates are accumulated to get the summary totals. The probability of achieving the estimated amount can be improved by building detailed cost and time estimates for a work package.
Bottom-up estimating is the project managing tool followed by many of the firms to estimate the cost and duration of project tasks. The bottom-up estimation consumes more time.
Answer:
foster diverse interests and allow for the representation of more radical alternatives
Explanation:
A multi-party system is a political arrangement that is set up to provide the ability for multiple political parties to take control of the government independently or in a coalition. In the American context where two parties dominated the political stage, a multi-party system ensured that regional and local parties have a fair chance of winning elections and more attention will be given to more views.
Answer: True
Explanation: Research studies are diverse in nature and as such conducting a research study involves adopting the best setting, method or environment which would have the least external effect on our analysis. Some research studies may involve studying subjects in their natural habitat or environment, such research studies may include studies on behavioral patterns, reasoning and son on. While some research studies involves adopting a controlled setting whereby the researcher moderates the exposure of participants to certain degree of adjustment. Laboratory experiment are particularly important in the biological and health research whereby exposure levels are controlled and carefully monitored, and administered treatment under certain conditions such as temperature must also be monitored. Laboratory research of this sort may be very difficult to replicate in actual negotiation.
Answer: have to find a way to address the issue
Explanation:there is a saying that if you cannot change them, you have to be like them but this is very wrong. In every organization you find yourself, you have to keep your intergrity intact. If your supervisor fails to address the issue, you take it to the next in command. This might bring backlash at you and even when your report is not being addressed, continue pressing on and one day your supervisor or any appropriate authority you reported to will address the issue. but remember don't change who you are for anything at all.
