Answer:
The fourth one.
Explanation:
Its a matter of ruling out answers. Einstein didn't care what others thought, also he didn't usually publicize his works. And though three sounds good, he was actually usually unmotivated because he felt like there was too much sometime, or too little other.
The Clovis were classified as hunter gatherers as they used hunting and foraging to obtain food.
Legalism (or nomism), in Christian theology, is the act of putting law[clarification needed] above gospel by establishing requirements for salvation beyond repentance and faith in Jesus Christ and reducing the broad, inclusive, and general precepts of the Bible to narrow and rigid moral codes.[1] It is an over-emphasis of discipline of conduct, or legal ideas, usually implying an allegation of misguided rigour, pride, superficiality, the neglect of mercy, and ignorance of the grace of God or emphasizing the letter of law at the expense of the spirit. Legalism is alleged against any view that obedience to law, not faith in God's grace, is the pre-eminent principle of redemption. On the Biblical viewpoint that redemption is not earned by works, but that obedient faith is required to enter and remain in the redeemed state.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the best option would be that it creates "checks and balances" since its main purpose is to eliminate the possibility of tyrannical rule. </span>
For the answer to the question above, the answer is The Mandate of Heaven. T<span>the idea that there could be only one legitimate ruler of China at a time, and that this ruler had the blessing of the gods. They used this </span>Mandate<span> to justify their overthrow of the Shang and their subsequent rule</span>
