Answer:
Aristotle says when actions appear useful either as ends or as means to an end in light of any of the previously named goods, they are performed for that purpose, furthermore Aristotle points out that actions should be guided by set goals in order to attain personal objectives.
The correct answer is A. Supported of slavery insisted It was moral because it was practiced in biblical times, while abolitionists argued that it was immoral because God created all people in His Image.
Explanation:
Slavery was a common practice during the 1800s in the Southern states that depended on it due to its economic model based on agriculture; at the same time, this practice was strongly opposed by the northern states that had an industrialized economic model. These opposite points of view about slavery were supported through different arguments including moral arguments that focused on whether slavery was ethical or "correct".
About this, people in the south and general supporters of slavery promoted the idea slavery was moral because it was a common practice during the history and was even part of the bible, which they consider as the law of God. On the opposite, abolitionists stated God had created all people as equal because everyone including slaves were made in His Image.
Answer:
I think the answer is
D. rewarding loyal political supporters with jobs or money
Here's an example of patronage:
Patronage is customers or the financial support from customers or guests. An example of patronage is all of the customers at a deli. An example of patronage is money received by a hotel during a convention. ... Shopkeepers thanked Christmas shoppers for their patronage.
Hm, The diffrent goverments will control each other, at the same time will be controlled by itself, is most likely. Although, it would'nt be diffrent goverment, it would be govermental part's, or states. Each state has the same type of govement, at the same time, they dont. And, we rule ourselfs, as well as each other. We just learned about this in class, and I do think that this is correct, hope it help's!
Answer:
we would be different because we would be divide so wo would be seprate and have different cultural ideas and have seprate laws and and government and maybe evne we might to be state we could be like south america and have contries inside a contnet pardon my spelling
Explanation:
