Briefly explain ONE specific historical difference between Foner’s and McPherson’s interpretations

2 answers:

7 0

Finer centered around the general parts of how the United States was not completely reproduced and how it clutched on past viewpoints and how it ended while in McPherson's he centered around the developing level of progress for the Blacks like training and education.

IRISSAK [1]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The difference between the two authors is that on the one hand McPherson emphasizes as positive several social and economic changes while Foner discusses the lack of change.

Foner argues that the Reconstruction process was a failure because the political changes that were promoted were canceled. For his part, McPherson argues that the Reconstruction process was a great revolution considering the benefits it reported for the African American people.

With respect to the economic sphere, Foner argues that Reconstruction did not bring new opportunities while for McPherson it was a period that allowed the increase of economic opportunities.

You might be interested in

yuradex [85]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

In the United States;

The House of Representatives presiding officer is SPEAKER of the House

While the Senate's presiding officer is first, a Vice President or elected Senate, or in a rare event, Chief Justice

2. Aside from their respective role as presiding officers, the presiding officer of the Senate is more powerful due to the following reason:

He is the first in a line of succession to the position of President,

He also acts as a form of checks and balances by the executive branch to the legislation because he acts as the tiebreaker to the final decision made in the senate.

Also, the Senate gives the final legislative approval to a bill, and it is the presiding officer that oversees its approval.

8 0

2 years ago

All of the following were lucrative industries in New England EXCEPT

umka21 [38]

That would be D slave trading

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

• China

Pachacha [2.7K]

The word Vietnam is derived from two Chinese words meaning "the Viet kin in the South". Traditionally, the people of Vietnam have been regarded by westerners as staunchly xenophobic, and, as such, have been viewed as having a long standing contempt for Chinese influence on the region. Border and island disputes have only exacerbated long-standing tensions between the two nations. Vietnam and China share many common cultural traditions which originated from the wet rice cultivation. China controlled Vietnam for about 1000 years, a rule which ended in 939CE. Thus, Vietnamese culture, writing, politics, religion, etc. were sinicized to a a certain degree. Yet the degree to which Vietnam preserved a distinct identity and maintained separate traditions should also be noted. During the 1st and 2nd Indochinese Wars, Vietnam grew closer to PR of China and received some funding, material, and advisors from the PRC. However, war with China in 1979 renewed hostilities. the reason why Vietnam and china are close because is that they are both communism country, there isn't much comminusim country left in the world

7 0

2 years ago

Which sentence describes how romantic thinkers contributed to nationalist feelings in Europe?

Ratling [72]

<span>B.They introduced the idea that each nation had its own unique abilities.</span>

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

57:28

Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

B) Documents showing the increase in Egypt’s wealth during this time period