1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WINSTONCH [101]
3 years ago
10

Briefly explain ONE specific historical difference between Foner’s and McPherson’s interpretations

History
2 answers:
Likurg_2 [28]3 years ago
7 0
Finer centered around the general parts of how the United States was not completely reproduced and how it clutched on past viewpoints and how it ended while in McPherson's he centered around the developing level of progress for the Blacks like training and education.
IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The difference between the two authors is that on the one hand McPherson emphasizes as positive several social and economic changes while Foner discusses the lack of change.

  • Foner argues that the Reconstruction process was a failure because the political changes that were promoted were canceled. For his part, McPherson argues that the Reconstruction process was a great revolution considering the benefits it reported for the African American people.

  • With respect to the economic sphere, Foner argues that Reconstruction did not bring new opportunities while for McPherson it was a period that allowed the increase of economic opportunities.

You might be interested in
Compare and contrast India & Vietnam's independence movements in three sentences
Afina-wow [57]
<span> No matter if nation’s independence (de jure) was violent or non- violent, the consequences of decolonization, among them crippled economies, ethnic violence and even global conflict, eventually led to developing nations still not economically independent</span>
4 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP!!!!
Novay_Z [31]
Hello to answer your question fully.

<span>C. the right to vote

                   Signed by,</span> Frequent Answerer Sargedog
7 0
3 years ago
Why were the british able to win the battle of Britain
iogann1982 [59]

Answer:

they had really good radar equipment at the time.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which organization was accused of spying on American citizens? Homeland Security Council (HSC) National Security Agency (NSA) De
kykrilka [37]

National Security Agency (NSA)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Following the end of the Third Punic War, Carthage was made a Roman province
Wewaii [24]
False, at the end of the Third Punic war in 146BC, they re-developed as Roman Carthage which had become a major city of the Roman Empire in the province of Africa. It didn’t BECOME the province, it was a city within it.
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The House of the Prophet in Medina became the prototype for the ____________. Group of answer choices Roman atrium house Gothic
    11·1 answer
  • How did ancient greece compare with ancient mesopotamia
    7·1 answer
  • When did china invade Japan that started ww2 in Asia
    11·2 answers
  • Which artists made sun disk artworks featuring a horse-drawn chariot pulling the sun?
    15·2 answers
  • What did the Father Francisco Hidalgo as the French governor of Louisiana to do​
    7·2 answers
  • Unit Test
    15·2 answers
  • Which geographic feature was used to establish the proclamation line of 1763
    5·1 answer
  • Which contribution did George Mason make to the U.S. Constitution?
    9·1 answer
  • Fix my paragraph or
    12·1 answer
  • William John's praised the glorious past of India?​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!