Answer:
Higgs's argument is stronger because Folsom's primary arguments involved quotes. Quotes can be unreliable, especially if chosen with bias from a selected group of people. Beyond that, quotes from people that lived in the moment are often short-sighted and don't understand long term effects. While Folsom does also source historians, he focuses a lot on Roosevelt's interest spending and believes that the money that went back to the American people actually prolonged suffering. Higgs, however, focuses on the short and long-term effects of the New Deal and uses a lot of data to prove his point. While he does have quotes, he doesn't rely on them to make or break his argument, unlike Folsom. Higgs is also able to understand some of the negatives of the New Deal, unlike Folsom who did not pay any attention to the other side of the issue.
Explanation:
This is for part two of the question.
Answer:
The completion in 1825 of the Erie Canal below connecting lake Erie with the Hudson River,was an event of major importance in Michigan history because it greatly facilitated the transportation of passengers and freight between the eastern seaboard and Michigan ports.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Indian Wars were a protracted series of conflicts between Native American Indians and white settlers over land and natural resources
<span>It was taken over by europe. The Europeans would also exploit the africans. Leopold would take over and take their leather. He used this leather for some of his weapons. The africans political entities vanished by 1914 also</span>
Answer and Explanation:
I believe he taught that salvation and, consequently, eternal life are not earned by good actions..
