Answer:
0.0075 rugs per dollar
Explanation:
(b)
Total labor cost:
= 520 hours × $15 per hour
= $7,800
Total solvent cost:
= 100 gallons × $5 per gallon
= $500
Total machine rental cost:
= 22 days × $75 per day
= $1,650
Multi-factor productivity:
= Number of rugs ÷ (Total labor cost + Total solvent cost + Total machine rental cost)
= 75 ÷ ($7,800 + $500 + $1,650)
= 75 ÷ $9,950
= 0.0075 rugs per dollar
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below
a. The economic order quantity is
= sqrt ((2 × annual demand × ordering cost) ÷ carrying cost)
= sqrt ((2 × 1,215 × $10) ÷ $75)
= 18 units
b) Average number of bags on hand is
= EOQ ÷ 2
= 18 ÷ 2
= 9
c) Orders per year is
= D ÷ EOQ
= 1215 ÷ 18
= 67.5
= 68
d) Total cost = Total carrying cost+ Total ordering cost
= (Q ÷ 2)H +(D ÷ Q)S
= (18 ÷ 2)75 + (1215 ÷ 18) × 10
= 675 + 675
= $1350
Answer:
Inelastic; elastic
Explanation:
Goods with inelastic demand curves tend to raise more government revenue compared to goods with the elastic demand curve. An increase in price does not affect the demand of inelastic goods and it remains the same, that is why, governments usually increase the prices of goods that have inelastic demand curve, for example, petrol and toll tax, etc.
Depends upon what you call entry level jobs and where you're at i've seen anything from 30k to 70k
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
