SUMMARY: 64 words shortened- 146 words paragraph(original-210 words)
Scientists look for answers in outer space or in the depths of the sea. Georg Steinhauser observed his bellybutton to find answers, he also solved one of life's greatest mysteries. Austrian chemists researched navel and navels of others for three years. Steinhauser presented medical hypotheses. Vienna University Scientist analyzed 500 samples of make up of the lint, most of it was made of cotton from clothes, fabric pieces aren't alone. Steinhauser discovered the average bellybutton contains dead skin, sweat, dust, and fat. His notes also explain how lint gathers. Stomach hairs grow in a circular pattern around the belly button acting like small hooks catching and hold Objects within. Shaving these hairs can lead to a lint-free bellybutton. Objects of your navel may be a nuisance, research tell us lint has a purpose. It's nature's way of protecting your belly button from germs and unwanted contents.
The answer to this question is "Erikson's stages psychosocial stages". An eriksonian psychosocial stage that encompasses procreation, productivity, and creativity. This is continuously developed by Erik Erickson. It has five stages and each stage compares and highlights identity versus role confusion.
Correct, it depends on the Super connector. Social networks are related to each connection. And if we are linked to one Super connector we have more chance to be even more linked to other people.
Vygotsky's theory of the Z<span>one of Proximal Development (ZPD) asserts that c</span>hildren can master some tasks with the help of others. The ZPD theory discusses the differences between what learners are able and not able to do without help from other sources. Just like Piaget, Vygotsky argues that children are better self-learners who learn independently.
Answer:
Mid-range theory.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, what Robert Merton developed as Middle-range theory is a style of sociology that avoids extremes: it focuses on institutions, not tiny groups and not whole societies, and it holds theory and empirical observation in balance. The way this is applied is, overall, to start with an empirical phenomenon which is then abstracted to create general statements to be verified, or not, by data. As it was mentioned before, it avoides extremes: it won't study small groups or whole societies, it will focus it's attention on institutions.
