Answer:
Maria exhibited moral relativism.
Explanation:
Moral relativism stands for an idea that there’s no such a thing as an absolute set of morals. It’s a version of morality that says “to each her own,” and those who follow it say, “Who am I to judge?”
Moral relativism can be understood in a few ways. For example, there is <em>cultural relativism</em>. It says that moral standards are <em>culturally defined</em>. There is also some common values that seem nearly universal, such as <em>honesty and respect</em>, but many differences appear across cultures when people evaluate moral standards around the world.
Societies make their moral choices based on their own customs and beliefs. People tend to believe that the “right” moral values are the values that exist in their own culture.
Normative moral relativism has the idea that all societies should accept each other’s <em>differences</em> in moral values, because there are no such things as universal moral principles. Philosophers don’t agree. Let’s say forbidding a woman to have a job is okay in some cultures, that doesn’t necessarily mean that other cultures cannot rightfully condemn it.