1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
3 years ago
9

Why would the US want to leave Vietnam rather than securing total victory ?

History
1 answer:
valkas [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

By the late 1960s, US political and military leaders got convinced they could not win the war by any means. The war would extend indefinitely - an unacceptable option - and the Communist North Vietnamese were determined to resist as long as it was necessary, despite the horrendous suffering and destruction; actually this is what the Vietnamese have done throughout their history against foreign occupiers since ancient times.  The exorbitant financial cost of the war was also a major headache for the government.  And there were the rising numbers of American casualties, a fact that was politically negative. Another major factor was the powerful peace movement in the USA, many people were opposed to the continuation of the war, social support for US involvement in Southeast Asia wasn´t strong. The US could not win that war.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Hijacked planes crashed into the World Trade Center and the ___ on September 11, 2001
guapka [62]
Pentagon Is the Answer
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which Brazilian city would be MOST likely to have high-tech manufacturing jobs for its residents?
pickupchik [31]
The most high tech city in Brazil is rio
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Free Soil Party, and Liberty Party important and major?
goldenfox [79]

Hey!

Answer:

Free-Soil Party, (1848–54), minor but influential political party in the pre-Civil War period of American history that opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories. Fearful of expanding slave power within the national government, Rep. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania in 1846 introduced into Congress his famous Wilmot Proviso, calling for the prohibition of slavery in the vast southwestern lands that had been newly acquired from Mexico. The Wilmot concept, which failed in Congress, was a direct ideological antecedent to the Free-Soil Party. Disappointed by the ambivalent position of the Whig Party toward slavery, “Conscience” Whigs held a convention in August 1848 at Buffalo, New York. There they were joined by delegates from 17 states drawn from the Liberty Party and the antislavery faction of the New York Democrats, known as “Barnburners.” The Free-Soilers’ historic slogan calling for “free soil, free speech, free labour, and free men” attracted small farmers, debtors, village merchants, and household and mill workers, who resented the prospect of black-labour competition—whether slave or free—in the territories.

In early 1840, abolitionists founded the Liberty Party as a political outlet for their antislavery beliefs. A mere eight years later, bolstered by the increasing slavery debate and growing sectional conflict, the party had grown to challenge the two mainstream political factions in many areas. In The Liberty Party, 1840–1848, Reinhard O. Johnson provides the first comprehensive history of this short-lived but important third party, detailing how it helped to bring the antislavery movement to the forefront of American politics and became the central institutional vehicle in the fight against slavery.

As the major instrument of antislavery sentiment, the Liberty organization was more than a political party and included not only eligible voters but also disfranchised African Americans and women. Most party members held evangelical beliefs, and as Johnson relates, an intense religiosity permeated most of the group’s activities. He discusses the party’s founding and its national growth through the presidential election of 1844; its struggles to define itself amid serious internal disagreements over philosophy, strategy, and tactics in the ensuing years; and the reasons behind its decline and merger into the Free Soil coalition in 1848.

<em>You can refer to these 3 paragraphs, </em>

<em>Hope it helps :)</em>

<em>Though I may be wrong :(</em>

<em>Have a great day!</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Which is true about ideological parties?
Lady bird [3.3K]

The correct answer to this question is C) some ideological parties have been around a long time. 

A sentence that is true about political parties is that some ideological parties have been around a long time.

Ideological parties based its ideology on beliefs that were created from the formation of the party, like economic, cultural, political, environmental or social matters. Ideological party's members have concerns on different matters than traditional parties. Their set of beliefs make them have strong convictions that are going to defend in any circumstance. Some times these ideological parties represent a good and firm opposition to the ruling party. It is true that some ideological parties have been around a long time.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Whats the historical and dramatic role of the chorus in ancient greek drama
TiliK225 [7]

The chorus fights for the benefit of the entire community and what the choir always says has an argument, just like the replicas of others  characters. Another important part of the choir is to introduce us to the mythical story that tragedy relies on, which is very important to us today because almost every surviving tragedy is based on some mythical story. It is not necessarily a mythical story, but also some real historical event. In this case, the chorus provides us with the necessary information and context without which our understanding of the tragedies would be greatly impeded.

Explanation:

  • If the emphasis was on actors, acting as in a later tragedy, the choir played a purely supporting, supporting role. Sometimes a choir of 15 people stood in three rows of five people each, that is, in five kinds.
  • Comedy choirs often had an even number and had a different schedule, depending on the setting. The choir, sorted by type, enters the stage singing an intro song, and was eventually answered by the exit song with which the action ended. After the opening song, the choir sang stasimon, standing songs sung by the choir after taking their place on stage and which at times had a digressive element.
  • In most cases, the choirist came in front of the choir, which gave a musical background to the declamation, so in such a structure the choir displayed and interpreted its stage parties through declamation, singing and declamation.

Learn more on Ancient Greek drama on

brainly.com/question/913257

brainly.com/question/1191167

#learnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How much were soldiers paid in ww1?
    7·2 answers
  • What decisions were made at the first and second continental congress meetings
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an effect of the increased use of canals and railroads in the mid-1800s?
    6·1 answer
  • Which department did the US government create immediately after the 9/11 terrorist attacks? the Department of Defense the State
    15·1 answer
  • HELP ME AND MAKE IT SANPPPPPPPPY WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 50 POINTS
    11·1 answer
  • What is Romanticism? a period of great European cultural achievement that lasted from the fourteenth to the early seventeenth ce
    14·1 answer
  • Write a 2-3 paragraph essay discussing the nature of scarcity and its relationship with opportunity cost.
    5·1 answer
  • Which areas were included in the Emancipation Proclamation?
    9·2 answers
  • Who is your Bias in bts mine is jungkook
    6·1 answer
  • Which caliphate ruled during the golden age of islam?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!