Ames wants to informally prove the converse of the Pythagorean Theorem by producing some evidence that supports it.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
ANSWER
Yes it is very true
<u>EXPLANATION</u>
If the two equations intersect at then this point must satisfy the two equations.
We substitute in to erquation (1)
We now substitute in to erquation (2) also
Since the point satisfy all the two equations, it is true that they intersect at
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you should put the axis of symetry as 5, -7 because f(x)= (x-h)^2+k and h is 5 and k is -7. the axis of symetry is x=5 because that is the "folding point" of the graph. Next, you would have to plug In 4 and 6 as your helping points to tell you where the other points of the function are going to be.
Plug 4 in and you get -6. plug 6 in and you get -6. plot the points (4, -6) and (6,-6).
Hope this helps!
:)
