Question

Select a recent editorial article from a reputable news outlet, such as the New York Times or the Washington Post. Read the article, identify the author's conclusion, and write a brief analysis answering the following questions:
What is the author's conclusion or main point?
How does the author attempt to make the case?
Does the author use logical argumentation? Does the author use rhetoric? A combination of both?
Is the author's position reasonable? Why or why not?

Answer 1

Answer: Editorial article

Explanation: The author's main point is that president Trump should select a scientist to run the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, someone who is qualified and will not modify their stance when pressured by office.

The author uses logical argumentation as he/she gives arguments such as the fact that the NOAA is an important referent on global warming, and that president Trump dismisses this issue although facts show that it is a real event. Rhetoric is also used to refer to discredit Trump's persona.

The author's position is reasonable given the importance of weather forecasting to prevent tragedies and loss of lives, as well as to take action to reduce climate change. The NOAA should be run by someone equally capable and impartial who can put their service above their personal political interests.