Answer:
The best possible answer in this case is B, but that is not entirely correct.
Explanation:
Any premise for overthrowing an independent does not come from the preamble to the Declaration of Independence, but rather the second body paragraph. The Preamble merely states that the 13 colonies had reason to remove themselves from Britannia rather than explain that there are reasons for nations and states to seceed from others.
Answer: D. None of the above
Explanation:
In the above case in the question, Kimberly has done nothing wrong. What was done was simply followed the principle of demand.
In this case, she saw that she was the first cinema to show the movie and seek to maximize profit. Some there'll be an increase in demand for the movie, thus can being about an increase in price which is what happened in this case.
Therefore, what she did is not illegal, and unfair. Therefore, the best option is D.
