Answer:
Answer: B. US police forces were created and reported to local and state governments
Explanation:
The United States operates a Federal system of Governments which gives states the power to govern themselves to a high degree. This includes policing. In the states themselves, local authorities then have their own police agencies which keep the peace.
For this reason there are over 16,000 police agencies in the United States ranging from City police on one end to Federal agencies on the other but these are technically not police so the highest police rank is the State police.
This is unlike in the UK where policing is territorial (not Federal) with police officers having limited powers outside their assigned territories which include England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Explanation:
Answer:
Like the Metropolitan police American police where organized in a quasi-milatary command structure. There main task was the prevention of crime and disorder, and they provide a wide array of other public services.
Generally, the courts have the power to declare certain types of contracts <u>void </u>on the grounds that they are contrary to<u> public policy</u>.
Courts commonly follow the law that the parties expressly or impliedly intend to govern the agreement, provided that it bears a reasonable relation to the transaction and the parties acted in correct religion.
The primary factors required for the agreement to be a legally enforceable contract are mutual assent, expressed by a valid offer and popularity; ok attention; capability; and legality. In some states, an element of consideration may be glad by using a valid replacement.
A contract is a venture or agreement by using a person or company to do any creation paintings or activity under certain terms and conditions. these terms are used in conditions of settlement in production.
Learn more about the contract here:brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
Answer:
Because he let his son borrow the gun for free, and had no knowledge of any issues it may have, he is not liable for his son's injury. His son did it to himself
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
I don't think I have any explanation
