SOMEONE PLEASE ANSWER THIS ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!

History

2 answers:

yaroslaw [1]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

A. A rise in southern segregation laws spurred African Americans to abandon areas with legalized discrimination

DIA [1.3K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The answer is A.

Hope this helps...

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which best describes black participation in politics during Reconstruction? Black paricipation in politics was limited only to v

Novay_Z [31]

During Reconstruction, Blacks tended to "not participate in politics during Reconstruction because they were limited in voting rights and an understanding the process." Although they were technically free, many barriers still existed.

4 0

3 years ago

QUESTION: How does having written rules about how Congress

topjm [15]

Explanation:

Becuse when someone says to the country that this is your country rules then on first day everyone will apply the rules but as the time passe pupils will be careless thats why tha laws are written in a book That is called The Book Of Law

8 0

3 years ago

the question is? do you believe that no person knowingly does evil and therefore all evil is ignorance.

Komok [63]

Answer:

noppeee

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

/explain and evaluate the views of anaximander regarding the nature of substance.

chubhunter [2.5K]

Early Greek philosopher Anixamander (ca. 610 – 545 BC) was a monist. That means he believed that ultimately there is just one sort of substance underlying all the different things we see in the physical universe. He put forth the idea that this single underlying substance of all things is something beyond our experience. He called it the ἄπειρον (apeiron), which means "the boundless" or "the limitless." Anaximander was reacting to the views of Thales, a previous thinker from his same town, Miletus, who had suggested that there was one underlying substance to all things, and that water was that essential element. Anaximander objected to Thales' thought, because water is something we all see and experience readily in the perceived world. He believed any underlying or base-level substance, from which water and any other physical stuff originated, had to be something beyond the boundaries of our present experience, or "the boundless."

One evaluation of Anaximander's views came from another Milesian philosopher who followed him: Anaximenes. Anaximenes saw the theory of Anaximander as dodging the question, "What is the main ingredient of all things in the universe." By saying, "It's boundless; it's something we don't know," had he really answered anything? So Anaximenes dismissed the view of Anaximander ... but didn't agree with Thales either. Anaximenes proposed that air was the underlying element of all physical phenomena.

You'll have to decide for yourself what you think of Anaximander's "boundless" theory.

8 0

3 years ago

how did great britain and the united states benefit from the independence of spains american colonies?

Anit [1.1K]

They were able to get more land

6 0

3 years ago