Answer:
Citing evidence is to show where in the text does your answer come from. That way, you have something to support your idea.
Explanation:
A credible narrator or reliable narrator will tell the story from the point of view of the truth, it does not matter if she or he has any attachment to what is going on in the story, readers can trust their words and understand the circumstances the way they the story unfolds. On the other hand, the unreliable narrator will tell their story from their point of view, they will embelish their deeds, hide or down play their problems, therefore the reader will always have the impression that the unreliable narrator is conducing the reader to trust them.
The crediable narrator will bring the facts to the reader and put the reader in the story, the reader can have the feeling of engagement on the narration. On the other hand, the unreliable narrator brings the uncertainty feeling tothe reader and the reader can dot the i's as they please because they know they cannot fully trust the narrator.
Answer:
In a 1939 letter, John Steinbeck wrote that his goal for The Grapes of Wrath was “to rip a reader's nerves to rags.” Through the novel, Steinbeck wanted readers to experience the life of the Dust Bowl migrants with whom he had spent time.
Explanation:
Answer:
The First One (Or A. if its multi choice)
Explanation:
There is no point complaining about Joan's giggling and snorting, Alison's sarcasm, or Lynnette's obsession with puppies and horses
Hope this helped! <3 Pls Award brainliest :p
