Answer:
The Declaration of Independence was issued “by authority of the good people of these colonies.” It was a revolution, you know.
The Pilgrims did not cite any specific authority for the Mayflower Compact. However, they declared themselves to be loyal subjects of the king of Great Britain. The Compact was based on their experience in organizing dissenting churches in England and, I suppose, in the Netherlands, where they had sought shelter from persecution. In some ways it was in keeping with the English common law, which dealt with problems and controversies as they arose, rather than waiting for the government to settle them. But in some ways it was a revolutionary, democratic statement, asserting the colonists’ right to make their own laws.
Answer:
<h2>Hi mate PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST IF MY ANSWER IS CORRECT PLEASE </h2>
Explanation:
The three-fifths compromise was an agreement reached by the state delegates at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Under the compromise, every enslaved American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes.
Origins of the Three-Fifths Compromise
At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the founders of the United States were in the process of forming a union. Delegates agreed that the representation each state received in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College would be based on population, but the issue of slavery was a sticking point between the South and the North.
It benefitted Southern states to include enslaved people in their population counts, as that calculation would give them more seats in the House of Representatives and thus more political power. Delegates from Northern states, however, objected on the grounds that enslaved people could not vote, own property, or take advantage of the privileges that White men enjoyed. (None of the lawmakers called for the end of slavery, but some of the representatives did express their discomfort with it. George MAS on of VIRG inia called for anti-slave trade laws, and Gouverneur Morris of New York called slavery “a nefarious institution.”)
Ultimately, the delegates who objected to enslavement as an institution ignored their moral QUAL-ms in favor of unifying the states, thus leading to the creation of the three-fifths compromise.
The causes were the following: England annulled the laws established by South Carolina and Virginia, controlled the courts of justice ordering that the customs authorities enter unauthorized homes and warehouses where it was felt that they could find contraband goods, the British placed taxes on sugar, coffee, wine, potassium, iron and silk, called the Law of Sugar. With this tax they wanted the colonies to collaborate with the expenses to maintain the bureaucracy. They also placed a tax for all printed materials, called the Stamp Act.
Benito Juárez!! <span>Espero que esto haya ayudado <3
</span>
In 1976, American anthropologist Edward T. Hall compared <u>culture</u> to an <u>iceberg</u>.
Culture is like an iceberg, according to Edward T. Hall's 1976 analogy. The bulk, or 90%, of culture's internal, or deep, components are supposedly concealed under the surface, with just around 10% of surface culture, or the exterior component of culture, being readily apparent.
The analogy of an iceberg for culture is accurate. Culture contains certain characteristics that can be observed and others that can only be surmised, envisioned, or inferred, much like an iceberg has a visible portion just above water and a bigger, invisible portion underneath the water's surface.
Learn more about culture here: brainly.com/question/25010777
#SPJ4
