Answer: The type of criminal punishment used before prisons were made were various measures adopted by different society but that which was prominent among these societies were exile(where someone is banished from an environment and sent far away with no promises of them returning), flogging, public humiliation.
Explanation:
1) The type of criminal punishment used before prisons were made were various measures adopted by different society but that which was prominent among these societies were exile(where someone is banished from an environment and sent far away with no promises of them returning), flogging, public humiliation.
These punishment's have influenced the modern day of philosophy by not making us know how people are really punished.
2) Today's prison are buildings which are fenced and well secured against the prisoners escaping, having guards guide them always.
3) Prisons serve the purpose of excluding criminals from the society, so residents of society would know that their is a result for bad behavior.
4) Private prison are used to administer to special cases, either highly criminal or special for a particular reason.
5) They are a few of them; they are being harmed by prisoners, they are faced with being antisocial due to they spend most of their time in prisons, especially when there is no shift or rotation of staff
Answer:
People created sacred hymns, long poems, and religious texts.
Explanation:
i got it right on edginuity
Answer:
What can you predict in someone's situation (from your point of view) that made them act a certain way? (read last paragraph for shorter explanation)
-
The Correspondent Inference Theory is a psychological model which is used to explain how people infer (predict) the disposition (characteristics) of another person based on that person’s actions, regardless of what the action achieved or any situational factors. Thus, it is an observer attribution model and not a motivational model. It was first proposed by Edward Jones and Keith Davis in 1966
Explanation:
Overall, the question is asking you to recall a memory of watching or observing someone's behavior to see if their reasons for behaving as such were voluntary or involuntary. For example, a waiter at a restaurant. They are polite to you, take your orders, and serve you, but they have to because their job requires them to. The purpose of the theory was to explain why people make the decisions they do; because they want to, or they have to.
example, there is someone speeding at 70 MPH and the limit is 45. You may assume they are in a hurry, or they just want to speed just because. That is until you make an observation as to why they may be speeding. If you can find an answer to this via experience, you will have a simple answer. Any example of behavior will work, such as people being rude to you, or being nice. What can you predict in their situation from your point of view that made them act like that?
+ The attribution theory's purpose also connects to how people explain the cause of behavior and situations... I.e, is someone angry because they are bad-tempered or because something bad happened ? the whole point in your answer should explain an encounter and know the reason why the other person acted the way they did.
Hey there!
This is called <span>precognition.
This essentially states that the individual either has ESP and telepathic dreams or visions that show them the future. Although this isn't 100 percent proven scientifically as it seems paranormal and untrue, many have claimed that their visions have proven true. Experimenting what's going on in the brain and the thoughts is a not yet occured advancement.
Hope this helps!</span>
