This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
The statement best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation is : C) Congress had no way to enforce or interpret the laws it passed, so the Constitution created the executive and judicial branches of the federal government. to put it simply, when the constitution was first made, American people still had no basic experience for running a govenrment, so we made a couple of mistakes that eventually were revised
Answer:
Two mian reasons why civilizations seek to expand their power:
- The quest for more resources: resources are always scarce, and every civilization wants to have more of them. Expanding its power, territory, and influence, is a way to seek control of more resources.
- To keep other civilizations from becoming more powerful: some civilizations have tried to expand their power mainly with the goal of keeping some neighboring civilization from becoming more powerful. For example, in Mesopotamia, the Assyrians conquered ended up conquering the Babylonians become the two civilizations were not able to coexist.
do you think expansion always leads to conflict?
No, expansion does not necessarily lead to conflict if the civilization that expands is pluralistic and respects cultural differences, and gives territories some degree of autonomy.
Answer:
Mississippi is a state of the southeast United States. There are many famous Native American tribes whose territories and homelands once located in Mississippi River Valley.
Explanation:
Native Americans had a culture in the Mississippi valley before the European conquest, by maize cultivation and trade for their society. The city centre of the Mississippi culture known as Cahokia, which reached its peak between the 10th and the 14th century. Numerous settlements located near the river managed trade networks that stretched to all direction of North America.
The arrival of the European settlers abused the balance of power among Indian nations (Appalachian). Many Indian tribes forced to move west and to settle in the Mississippi valley.
The names of the Mississippi tribes included the Biloxi, Choctaw, Dakota Sioux, Ibitoupa, Natchez, Okelousa, Pensacola, Chickasaw, Quapaw, Taposa, Tiou, etc.
They planted crops of pumpkins, corn, beans, and squash and also gathered wild foods such as fruit, roots, and nuts. They made sap in maple trees. They were also engaged in hunting and warfare.
Answer:
The answer is <u>B </u><u>The </u><u>Civil</u><u> </u><u>W</u><u>ar.</u>
