The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Indeed, young people have historically failed to participate in the election process - fewer young people vote than those of other age groups.
I think this occurs because young people feel there is a lot of corruption and lies in the political system, and that politicians do not act with integrity.
Many youngsters notice how legislators endlessly argue with each other in the House of Representatives and the Senate, or how is the relationship between the executive branch and the legislative branch. And they don't like what they see. They turn to the other side
How does this negatively impact democracy in the US?
Of course, that behavior is not good because youngsters are the next generation that is going to run the United States.
They have to be prepared, informed, ready to fill the highest political spots and corporative spots to take the US into the next decade. And if they are not informed and actively participate in politics, it is going to be difficult for them to understand what the country needs to move forward.
<span>Colonial slavery usually refers to slavery in the American Colonial period between the early 1600s and the late 1700s when the colonies became independent from Britain. </span>
Answer: Spain.
Explanation:
The Spanish Civil War was described as "dress rehearsal", because the bombing of Spanish cities by Nationalist rebels with the support of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, allowed them to test new weapons later used in World War II, like the He-111 and Do-17 bombers.
Particularly, gruesome was the bombing of Guernica, later depicted in Pablo Picasso´s painting because it was a military air force attack over civilians, which is considered as a war crime.
How do historians organize history? Of the flow of dates and events by putting these things in chronological order, or the order of dates in which events happened. By putting these events on a timeline or a diagram that shows the order of events in a time period.
plzz mark as brainliest
Answer: My response
Explanation:
Pros:
Troops are effictive in minimizing the threat of angry protesters, pemobs etc, through tactics such as blocking/holding back crowds, etc
They are often used in the events of a crisis, such as a war or natural disaster to aid with medical care, food distrubution, and other services
Cons:
Especially in oppressive regimes, troops might abuse their rights and use their influence to coerce innocent people to give them money, etc. They might also cause outrage by taking actions such as beating up, teargassing, killing, or mass arresting protesters
Troops may use their power to attempt coups, throwing off the stability of a countries govt.
Sorry for the spelling errors,
Jade
