1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sladkih [1.3K]
4 years ago
11

Historians use primary and secondary sources to collect historical evidence. What is the difference between these two sources?

History
1 answer:
____ [38]4 years ago
5 0
Primary sources are sources that are directly from the time that an event took place that can give first hand knowledge about an event or occurrence. These include newspaper articles, video footage, or a personal account from an individual who was there when a historical event took place. Whereas a secondary source is a step removed in that the author is analyzing primary sources or is writing from a position where they don't possess direct knowledge to an event but are using historical evidence to provide a perspective on a particular issue or historical event. 
You might be interested in
Which of the following was an outcome of California's application for statehood? The balance in the Senate tipped in favor of sl
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

The debate over the spread of slavery grew more bitter.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who has the responsibility to bring a case against a citizen who they suspect has committed a crime against the state?
poizon [28]

The State Prosecutor is responsible for bringing charges against someone suspected of committing a crime in their state's jurisdiction. The third choice is correct.

5 0
3 years ago
How were the approaches of teddy roosevelt and woodrow wilson to foreign affairs different?
KonstantinChe [14]
President Theodore Roosevelt's foreign policy can be characterized by his motto of "speak softly and carry a big stick." meaning he supported using force when necessary.On the other hand, Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy was mainly characterized by his belief in neutrality and governing based on morals.
5 0
3 years ago
Complete the chart by taking notes about the point of view of the laborers and the industrialists. Use information from the summ
shutvik [7]

These two groups differ by having different forms of production, one does it manually and the other in an industrialized way.

<h3>What is the difference between laborers and industrialists?</h3>

Laborers is a term to refer to workers who specialize in manual and craft work. On the other hand, industrialist is a term to refer to workers who prefer to use machinery to mass-produce various objects in a production chain.

According to the above, the difference between these two groups is that one prefers manual work, while the other prefers work by means of machines.

Also, laborers generally produce fewer products because each product takes longer, while industrialists mass-produce larger quantities.

Note: This question is incomplete because the chart is missing. However I can answer it based on my general knowledge.

Learn more about industry in: brainly.com/question/7721379

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Why would many people disobeying laws be an effective weapon to influence changing those laws
iragen [17]

Answer:

It is an attempt to influence society to accept a dissenting point of view. Although it usually uses tactics of nonviolence, it is more than mere passive resistance since it often takes active forms such as illegal street demonstrations or peaceful occupations of premises. The classic treatise on this topic is Henry David Thoreau's "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience," which states that when a person's conscience and the laws clash, that person must follow his or her conscience. The stress on personal conscience and on the need to act now rather than to wait for legal change are recurring elements in civil disobedience movements. The U.S. Bill of Rights asserts that the authority of a government is derived from the consent of the governed, and whenever any form of government becomes destructive, it is the right and duty of the people to alter or abolish it.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the initial issue that created a division for the muslims
    8·1 answer
  • Read the following excerpt from the speech:
    6·1 answer
  • Who has final approval of all formal amendments before they can be added to the Constitution.
    12·1 answer
  • What conclusion can you draw about Cyrus’s style of government after reading the passage? He ruled by fear and forced his people
    12·1 answer
  • What caused gaius gracchus death
    13·1 answer
  • Who did Jackson believe was to blame for him losing his first presidential election contest in 1824?
    10·1 answer
  • What other nations did Britain control besides India
    15·1 answer
  • Describe a noteworthy moment in the Battle of Gettysburg. please help!
    9·1 answer
  • When you provide information through writing that is:
    9·1 answer
  • Where does the constitution talk about war.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!