The following are reasons to conclude that Hamlet had not gone mad:
- He told Laertes that he had acted strangely because he was temporarily insane. Someone who was truly mad will not know this fact.
- He knowingly acted wildly when the King and Polonius arranged a meeting to observe him.
- He was also sane because he overheard something that Polonius said over the curtain and killed her for it.
The above three points are reasons to believe that Hamlet was not actually mad in the story.
He was simply acting up because he could still process the events that were happening around him.
Learn more about inferences here:
brainly.com/question/16750080
A. Tragic Flaw
In most Shakespearian tragedies, the characters suffer from an internal flaw which ultimately hurts them
Answer:
B. It shows that lawlessness actually hurts people in real ways.
Explanation:
If there is no food for the main character's family, then how will they eat? They will starve to death and if they steal from someone, since there is no law, they could be murdered as there is no consequence. Either way, laws may restrict many things, but it can help give people what they truly deserve.
Hope this helped! :)
Answer:
adjective
Explanation:
the noun is "the data" and "that he could gather" is describing the data (the noun) so it is an adjective
Answer:
500 years old
Explanation:
the age is describing the vase, therefore it isn't hyphenated.
