Answer:
a. $826,000.
Explanation:
The computation of the total manufacturing overhead is given below;
= (Indirect materials + indirect labor + factory supplies) ÷ expected machine hours × budgeted + (Depreciation + taxes + supervision)
= ($280,000 + $400,000 + $40,000) ÷ 200,000 × 160,000 + ($120,000 + $30,000 + $100,000)
= $826,000
Hence, the correct option is a.
Answer:
Yes under the theory of conversion.
Explanation:
Conversion occurs when an individual takes possession of an item and excercises ownership of it in a way that is in conflict with the real owner's right of possession.
In this instance Eddy paid in a cheque that was not owned by him. The onus was on the bank to confirm from the account owner the real beneficiary of the check.
This would have prevented the conversion of the check through an illegal indorsement.
Conversion is a common type of fraud with regards to dividend warrants where dividend warrants edited to present a different person as the owner of the check.
Little power, little money, are women or children
That statement is true.
If the statement come from a biased sources, the statement will be catered in a such a way to shine a positive light towards a certain person or establishment.
This makes the final report/writing became extremely unreliable.
Example of biased sources, news station that only tell good story about a specific party.
high bill
be put in place
viruses
the math involved in what they owe you
themselves
