Answer:
I would pay up to 81.52 dollars for the share that way I will get a 12% return at least
Explanation:
We need to calcualte the present value of the cash flow of each year using the formula for present value of a lump sum:
Dividends Present Value
1st year 3.00 2.678571429 *1
2nd year 4.25 3.38807398 *2
3rd year 106.00* 75.44870627 *3
<em>Value of the share at 12% discount rate 81.51535168</em>
*100 dollars from the sale plus 6 dollars of dividends
*1
Div: 3.00
time: 1
rate: 0.12
PV 2.678571429
*2
Dividends 4.25
time 2.00
rate 0.12000
PV 3.3881
*3
Maturity 106.00
time 3.00
rate 0.12000
PV 75.4487
Answer:
If the firm is going to need less than 50,000 motors, they should purchase them from the outside vendor.
If the firm is going to use between 50,000 to 59,999 motors, it should use process A.
If the firm expects to use 60,000 or more motors per year, it should use process B.
Explanation:
Process A:
contribution margin per unit = $11 - $7 = $4
break even number of units = $200,000 / $4 = 50,000 units
Process B:
contribution margin per unit = $11 - $8 = $3
break even number of units = $180,000 / $3 = 60,000 units
Answer:
Mike's recognized gain from the transfer of the house to him is:
$175,000
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Marital property = $1,500,000
Cost of property = $575,000
Residual value = $925,000
Alimony to Karen = $750,000 ($150,000 * 5)
Balance (Mike's) = $175,000
$175,000 represents the excess of the fair market value of the marital property after deducting the cost of property and the alimony paid to Karen. A gain of $175,000 is recognized by Mike after the property sale.
Answer:
- Now that the very evidence that lead to conviction of the defendant, that person will no longer serve the sentence given as a punishment as a result of the crime committed.
- Yes, the defendant would be free to go for now, unless they can produce any more evidence to charge him with the crime he allegedly committed.
- Conventionally it would go back to the trial court until and unless specified otherwise by the judge.
- It could go all the way up to the supreme court depending on whether the legal counsel handling the case puts in a request for it.
Hope that answers the question, have a great day!
The answer to the question above is letter D. If Natasha has a gross income of $66,429. And has an adjustment of $14,490 for her business losses, $3,584 for her business expenses and $4,813 for her retirement contribution plan. The total remaining income is $43,542.
