1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MatroZZZ [7]
4 years ago
7

In the mid 1800's, a South Carolina "Fire-eater" would have supported

History
2 answers:
JulijaS [17]4 years ago
7 0
The answer is b secession from the union
eimsori [14]4 years ago
4 0
I think the answer is B.

You might be interested in
31.
Fed [463]

Answer:

Since the Soviet economy was falling behind other capitalist countries. As well as the Soviets long reputation for being corrupt, perestroika eased the corruption and the monopolies in the Soviet union at the time, as well as helped their government to be more transparent than before. Most soviet bureaucrats did not like this, as they wanted to continue their corrupt buisness dealings in secret.

Perestroika eased Trade restrictions.

Perestroika was meant to jumpstart the barely surviving Russian economy, however in some sectors this had the opposite effect.

6 0
3 years ago
Can producers function without <br> sunlight?
mezya [45]
No they can't  function because it is the majour source of energy.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jelaskan bahwa Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan mampu mewujudkan mahasiswa yang smart and good citizen!
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Demikian juga, kewarganegaraan penting untuk mendorong wacana yang sehat di antara orang-orang dari sudut pandang yang berbeda. Ini juga membantu siswa belajar bagaimana menemukan kesamaan dengan orang-orang yang berbeda dari diri mereka sendiri, terutama dalam hal penegakan hak asasi manusia.

8 0
3 years ago
What was the supreme court's response to the civil rights act of 1875? a. the justices declared the act constitutional. b. the j
polet [3.4K]

The correct answer is d. the justices declared the act unconstitutional because it protected against acts of private discrimination, not state discrimination

The Supreme Court ruled that the Federal government did not have the authority to prohibit private discrimination.

6 0
3 years ago
These facts are attributed to which person?:
Akimi4 [234]
It would be B. jane do don’t
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Describe the political,<br> social, and economic<br> situation in the early 1900s<br> in India.
    8·1 answer
  • What factors led to increase immigration to the us
    10·1 answer
  • According to article 1 of the constitution who has the ability to approve foreign treaties?
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP MEEEEE
    13·1 answer
  • "Women in the nineteenth century had the responsibilities but not the rights of citizenship."
    10·1 answer
  • How might the spread of
    14·1 answer
  • Help me pls ASAP plsssssssssssss
    12·1 answer
  • During what years did colonization mostly happen
    15·2 answers
  • What type of Government did the roman empire have in the middle ages?
    12·1 answer
  • According to the legend, why was the Tower of Babel built?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!