<span>"The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist" is an indefensible claim. The others can be proven or at least debated over because at some point in time all of them have true and false. For instance, the majority of congress and the President have been from the same political party. Also, the majority of congress and the President have NOT been from the same political party. Therefore, you can compare the difference between true and false. Political boundaries have always existed. As a result, you cannot comfortably compare it to anything else.</span>
Answer:
All American Indian groups lost land and power
Explanation:
The British set aside land west of the Appalachian Mountains for American Indians, but the colonists refused to leave so all American Indian groups lost land and power
Answer:
To spur trade, A, B, and C deicide on economic integration where there were they agreed on a common external trade policy, and allowed factors of If seven countries formed a common market, which of the following would be a feature of their trade agreement? lowers foreign exchange and hedging costs in Europe.
Explanation:
Answer:
Similarities: World War I and World War II were wars conducted on a massive scale unlike any other wars in history. They were similarly caused by nationalism, imperialism, alliances, and militarism. Both wars saw countries trying to upset the power balance in Europe for their own gain. Difference: While WWI was fought in the trenches and used machine guns and poisonous gas, WWII was fought using modern artillery and machines utilizing more airplanes, ships, tanks, and submarines. Special operations methods were also developed during this war together with atomic missiles and secret communications.
Answer:
Opposition
Explanation:
I am not aware of whether you are looking for a general answer or not, but the elimination of opposition is usually what makes a fascist gov't
