Yes, because he showed great leadership. He helped the US out during the Great Depression. He was confident, and turned out to be a great, powerful, and respected president.
Imperialism can be in the form of a colony where a foreign country is in control of a protectorate with the local government controlled by a foreign country.
Answer:
D. the negative social effects of excessive drinking.
Explanation:
For the answer to the question above, are you referring to colonial period?
because during the colonial period, European women in America remained entitled to the legal protections provided by imperial authorities, even when they occupied unfree statuses, such as indentured servitude. For instance, when masters or mistresses mistreated their indentured servant women physically violated the terms of their labor contracts, the servants had a right to complain at the local court for redress; in some jurisdictions, their pleas met with remedies from the bench. Nevertheless, patriarchal models of authority prevailed, and despite their access to the courts, indentured women remained restricted by a series of laws that gave their masters extensive powers over them. They could not marry or travel while under contract, and if they ran away, became pregnant, or challenged their masters, they would be penalized with extra terms of service. While the law in Virginia, for instance, penalized masters who impregnated their servant women by freeing the latter, at the same time the statute averred that such women might be unfairly “induced to lay all their illegitimate to their masters” in order to gain their freedom. The statutory language is clearly indicative of class-based notions of dissolute sexuality. Indeed, the statutes enacted across imperial North America, like those iterated above, were devoted to creating and enforcing differences among women on the basis of not only race but class as well.
Answer:
A landowner's point of view.
Explanation:
The given passage is from the contract between a landowner and a sharecropper titled "A Sharecrop Contract" (1882). The contract clearly states the terms of the agreement, which mostly agrees or favors the landowner's interest.
The contract, and especially the given points mostly make points for the interest of the landowner. And the contract seems to be written from the landowner's point of view, for it clearly states the other party as <em>"[they] must sow and plow"</em> which can only be the other person and not the landowner. landowners will not sow or plow the land, so it is quite obvious that the contract has been written from the landowner's point of view.
