In what ways are the land of Australia and New Zealand alike, and in what ways are they different ?

History

1 answer:

qwelly [4]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

They are alike due to the historic isolation of the both of them(New Zealand and Australia) from the rest of the world which resulted in animals and organisms that are not found anywhere else to develop in these two countries. They have flora and fauna found distinctly in both regions.

They are different in that Australia is full of red dirt due to its relatively dry climate and New Zealand is full of greenery because it’s a very wet country.Australia comprises of a large mainland and the island of Tasmania to the south while New Zealand consists of two main islands separated from Australia's southeastern region by the Tasman Sea.

You might be interested in

Which of the following ethnic groups in the middle East unsuccessfully tried to gain it's own, independent state or country?

tekilochka [14]

Iran tried getting their own freedom from mohammad mossadegh, so they went to the US for help

4 0

2 years ago

How are you involved in the Federal Government?

julsineya [31]

Answer:

If I am wrong I am very sorry

Explanation:

If you are apart of the three branches of government legislative ,executive and judicial who powers are by the constitution in cogress like the president and the federal courts.

8 0

2 years ago

How did the Nile River contribute to the emergence of Egyptian Civilization?

kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

Explanation:

even today the Nile floods yearly. the water washes over desert soil and makes it arable or plantable and thus, food is produced

6 0

3 years ago

As of 2009, what percentage of the U.S. population can trace their roots to Africa? Select the best answer from the choices prov

JulijaS [17]

Answer:

B. about 12%

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What were the reasons the bomb should not have been used on Japan? Should the atomic bomb have been used on Japan? Why or why no

vesna_86 [32]

The reasons for it not to be used can definitely be the collateral damage where around 150,000 civilians died. On the other hand, the atomic bombs can be said to have ended to war in Japan since it capitulated, allowing everyone to focus on Germany. It also prevented much greater losses since a military study of a Japan invasion pointed out that millions of people would die. Compared to that, 150,000 doesn't seem that much.

6 0

2 years ago