A few years ago I had an English teacher that encouraged "The Oreo Method"; it compares effective constructive criticism to an Oreo cookie.
The filling in the middle was the constructive criticism, but before and after that, you offer positive feedback for the writer.
Pretty self explanatory:
1. Provide one piece of positive feedback first and linger on it for a couple sentences; let them know how important that "thing" is and, in a way, praise them for doing it. This primes them to accept your feedback cause they know how thoroughly you've read and analyzed their work.
2. Offer any and all of the constructive criticism you have; stay subtle and be concise with all your feedback.
3. Offer more positive feedback, as many good things as you can come up with.
By submerging the constructive criticism between positive feedback, you keep their hopes up while still thoroughly conveying weak spots in their work.
I hope this kinda made sense; it's a very self explanatory idea so I had trouble elaborating on it.
Good modifies phone and is a predicate adjective, so a.
<span />
I left my SUITCASE in airport security
I accidentally took the receptionist pin while filling out papers at the INFORMATION DESK
I had to miss REHEARSAL because I got detention
All u have to do is put these words into sentences it might help if I u actually know what the words mean
Please provide the quote and I'd be more than happy to help.
Answer:
In conclusion, people should not be climbing the Himalayan mountains because of the extremely high death rates, impractical use of sherpas, and the numerous rumors about the once-feared giants of the east. The Himalayan mountains deserve to be respected and the people in the are should be helped. With people continuing to climb the mountain, neither of these things are being accomplished.
Hope this helps.
Explanation:
