The percentage of people who will live in urban settings in the year 2030 will most likely be more than 80.
<h3>What is deduced in the graph?</h3>
Already in 2019, the percent of urban population has already reached 81%, which shows us that the graph projection was correct.
Hence, the percentage of people who will live in urban settings in the year 2030 will most likely be more than 80.
Therefore, the Option D is correct
Missing options "A. less than 10% B. 40% to 60% C. 60% to 80% D. more than 80%"
Read more about urban settings
<em>brainly.com/question/10272238</em>
<em />
#SPJ1
I can't write you the whole paragraph but here are something you can say in your essay/ paragraphs.
- Cultural universals<span> are elements, patterns, traits, or institutions that are common to all human </span>cultures <span>worldwide.
</span>
- Cultural universals<span> are those guiding principles of </span>human civilization<span> that are so central to human identity that we can find them, in some form, in all societies - past and present - around the world.</span>
John Hancock, who was one of the wealthiest men in America at the time inherited his business from his uncle who was a mercantile businessman. He became a merchant, statesman, and served as a president of the Second Continental Congress amongst many other positions within that included Governor of Massachusetts.
Cuban missile crisis between the united states and the soviet union nearly resulted in a war
The October 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis was a direct and dangerous confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and it was the closest the two superpowers came to nuclear war.
During the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, leaders of the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a tense 13-day political and military standoff over the installation of nuclear-armed Soviet missiles on Cuba.
An American U-2 spy plane secretly photographed nuclear missile sites being built by the Soviet Union on the island of Cuba .
To know more about Cuban missile crisis here
brainly.com/question/12687037
#SPJ4
Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.
