Question

much of the world was undergoing a severe economic depression,beginning in 1929.how might poverty and unemployment have contributed to the rise of totalitarian leaders in the 1930s？

Answer 1

Not too sure but off the top of my head, I would say that as people get more desperate with unemployment and poverty, they are looking to a strong leader to help them out of their slump, hence the rise of totalitarian leaders.

Answer 2

Answer:

    Populism was a type of political situation experienced in Europe and Latin America between the 1930s and 1960s, which had a major propelling context for the 1929 crisis. At that time, several of the nations experienced a phase of economic development followed by the growth of the centers urban areas and the re-articulation of social and political forces. It was in the midst of these diverse transformations that populist practice gained ground.

    Populist politics is marked by the rise of charismatic leaders who seek to sustain their activities within the state through the broad support of majorities. Often, he abandons the use of ideological or partisan intermediaries to seek in the “defense of national interests” an alternative to the political tendencies of his time, be they traditionalist, oligarchic, liberal or socialist. In different ways, it propagates the belief in a leader above any other ideal.

    In addition to authoritarianism and assistentialism, populist governments are also very concerned with the use of the media as an instrument to publicize government actions. Through the installation or control of these media, populism uses a massive official propaganda that seeks to spread among the most different social groups through the unrestricted use of radio, newspapers, magazines and television stations.

    The rise of populist regimes has always been viewed with some suspicion by certain domestic or foreign political groups. The capacity to mobilize the masses established by such governments, the appeal to national interests and the lack of a clear political perspective could jeopardize the interests defended by the elites who controlled the ownership of land or the productive forces of the industrial sector.