Answer:
105
Step-by-step explanation:
70+35+m<2=180
70+35=105
180-105=75
m<2=75
m<3=105
Answer:
x ≥ 6; see below for a graph
Step-by-step explanation:
First inequality
7x -6 > 8
7x > 14 . . . . . . add 6
x > 2 . . . . . . . .divide by 7
Second inequality
3x+4 ≥ 22
3x ≥ 18 . . . . . . subtract 4
x ≥ 6 . . . . . . . . divide by 3
The values of x that will satisfy both inequalities are x ≥ 6. (All of those values are > 2.)
The solution to the inequalities is x ≥ 6.
__
Your graph will have a solid dot at x=6, indicating 6 is part of the solution set. It will be shaded to the right, with an arrow at the right end.
So you would use the law of sines so set up the equation sin18/16 = sin72/x (sin 72 being the top angle) and then you cross multiply and solve from there:)
Hope this helps!
Answer:
4 1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
Suppose that the objective of the experiment is to test if a certain treatment modifies the mean of the population of interest.
If for example, the treatment is "new fertilizer" and the population of interest is "yield of wheat crops"
Then you'd expect that using the new fertilizer will at least modify the average yield of the wheat crops.
The hypotheses will be then
H₀: μ = μ₀
H₁: μ ≠ μ₀
Where μ₀ represents the known average yield of wheat crops. (is a value, for this exercise purpose there is no need to know it)
We know that the treatment modifies the population mean, i.e. the null hypothesis is false.
The sample we took to test whether or nor the new fertilizer works conducts us to believe, it does not affect, in other words, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Then we are in a situation where we failed to reject a false null hypothesis, this situation is known as <em><u>Type II error</u></em>.
I hope this helps!
